Staff Publication: Battling Faulty Evidence

When courts ask forensic experts to answer difficult questions that the science isn’t equipped to answer, it can lead to miscarriages of justice, wrongful convictions, and irreparable harm. 

Clinton Hughes, Senior Supervising Forensic Attorney with Brooklyn Defenders’ Criminal Defense Practice, co-authored a commentary for the Journal of Forensic Sciences that challenges a disturbing new trend by a group of forensic scientists who are pushing to lower safeguards on how DNA evidence is used in U.S. courts. 

Hughes, alongside co-authors JD Schmid of the Minnesota Board of Public Defense and Chase Baumgartner of the Innocence Project of Fort Worth, warns that courts should not permit a new type of forensic science testimony that is based on incomplete and unreliable information and could mislead stakeholders, skew results, and lead to wrongful convictions. 

 

Latest News